|
This
report is an unsolicited, independent evaluation of the distributed
project management (DPM) market. It is primarily the result
of original research conducted by Collaborative Strategies
LLC (CS) between May and August 2002. The objective of this
report is to document the rapid evolution (revenues, users,
penetration, key vendors, etc.) of the DPM and services marketplace.
Users, vendors, investors, and other interested parties may
utilize this report to meet a wide variety of needs. Since
our founding in 1988, CS has gathered primary and secondary
market research from organizations that have deployed collaboration-oriented
applications. CS has also evaluated and analyzed scores of
vendor products and services over the years in this space.
This report is a result of the distillation and synthesis
of these two perspectives
|
Only 30 years ago, initiation of
projects within businesses was the exception rather than the rule.
Only 10 years ago, the ability to support distributed project teams
was an expensive and complex task. Today, thanks to the WWW, there
are almost 100 software tools and applications that support distributed
project management (DPM) functionality in both general and industry/process
specific arenas. Distributed Project Management: Update 2002
(Volume 1) profiles 33 general DPM vendors; Volume 2 of the
report will profile DPM vendors who have moved from the general
DPM market to specific industry and process markets.
Half of the vendors profiled last year are again
profiled this year; an additional 16 vendors are profiled this year.
Also included in this report are virtual team tools (VTT), because
there is so much feature overlap. The VTT vendors are: Lotus QuickPlace,
Documentum Team Manager, Open Text LiveLink, and SiteScape Enterprise
Forum. Although these vendors included some project management features,
they excelled in features that focused on the management of documents
and interactions between team members. 90% of the DPM vendors had
document management functionality, with most vendors supporting
functions like check-in, check-out, and version control.
10 trends are seen in DPM for 2002, including
the use of Web services, increased ASP support for DPM tools, the
incorporation of risk management and budgeting functions into DPM
tools, features to support the project management office (PMO),
support for micro projects, and the increasing integration with
ERP data sources and critical business processes.
The number of vendors selling directly (rather
than through a channel) increased about 13%, with enterprise licenses
vs. ASP remaining at the 80%/20% ratio. Target markets for DPM vendors
included government, professional services, IT organizations and
software projects, pharmaceutical/ healthcare, oil/gas/energy, manufacturing
(both discrete and process), financial services, aerospace, and
new product development.
There is an increasing reliance of DPM vendors
on partnerships, with the Big 5 consulting firms being the most
common alliance both in 2001 and this year. Last year, Primavera
and Niku were the most common vendors to be seen as competitors;
this year, Microsoft has taken the top competitor spot.
Venture funding for DPM tools continues. Overall,
about 1/3 of the vendors profiled received an average of $20M in
two rounds of funding. However, only 2% of the vendors profiled
saw capital investment as their growth strategy. In the past (2000-2001),
the most popular growth strategy was to add new features and functions.
This year, growth strategies have shifted from being technology-driven
to marketing- and sales-driven efforts. We believe this is the sign
of a rapidly maturing market. Additional evidence for this is the
15% increase in the average number of end users for a typical DPM
implementation. However, the adoption and penetration of these collaborative
technologies is still the number one challenge for DPM vendors.
20% more vendors are supporting both synchronous
and asynchronous collaborative functions; some of these vendors
have implemented these functions through partnerships with real
time collaboration vendors like WebEx Communications, Inc. We also
saw a corresponding increase in the level of interactivity supported
by DPM tools, with the VTT being the best at this. 70% of the DPM
vendors have some type of project budgeting functionality, but only
50% could do any additional financial analysis, such as risk management,
earned value analysis (EVA), and activity based costing. Many of
the vendors have also added functions to deal with all aspects of
a project’s life cycle.
Although the DPM market is projected to be $7.2B
by 2007, this last year has been challenging. Overall, DPM revenues
dropped 22% from 2001, and projections by most vendors for 2003
were also decreased. However, staff level growth for these vendors
and overall compound annual growth rate (CAGR) was about 25%, making
the value of the DPM market for 2002 just below $1B.
Table of Contents
| Executive Summary
|
|
Section 1: Introduction and Methodology
|
Taxonomy
DPM Taxonomy
Staying the Course
Virtual Teams Tools vs. DPM Tools
Volume 2 |
| Section 2: The Evolution
of the DPM Market |
| Introduction |
Project Portfolio Management
Feedback
Resource Management
2001 Trends
2002 Trends
|
| Section 3: Trends and Results
|
Alliances
Funding
Professional and Strategic Services
Growth Strategies for 2002
Scalability
Typical Number of End Users per Deployment
Adoption and Penetration of Collaborative Technologies
Threaded Discussions and Issue
Resolution
Features and Function Analysis
Asynchronous Collaboration Functions
Real Time Collaboration Functions Collaborative Strategies
Interactive Rating Web Native vs. LAN/WAN
Security and Access Rights
File Import/Export
Group Calendaring and Scheduling
|
| Additional Project Management
Features |
Reporting, Viewing, and Filtering
Project Resources and Budgeting
More About Risk Management
Document Managemen
Project Life Cycle
Pricing, Revenues, and Growth
Revenues
Size of Sale
Smallest Sales
Largest Sales
Typical Sales
The Effect of Pricing
|
| Section 4: Vendor Profiles |
ACME Interactive, Inc.
ActionBase Artemis
International Solutions Corp.
As-One, Inc.
AtTask, Inc.
Business Engine
Celoxis Technologies
CommonOffice.com
Computer Associates International, Inc.
Davis Technologies Group, Inc.
Documentum, Inc.
EDS Epiware, Inc.
eProject, Inc.
eRoom Technology, Inc.
ESNA
IBM/Lotus
InventX, Inc.
Marin Research, Inc.
MediaSolv, Inc.
Meridian Project Systems
Métier, Ltd.
Microsoft Corporation
NexPrise, Inc.
Open Text Corporation
Pacific Edge Software, Inc.
PlanView
Primavera Systems, Inc.
Project InVision International
Project.Net
SiteScape Inc.
Team Interactions, Inc.
Welcom |
| Distributed
Project Management Industry Report Update 2003
Ordering Information
To Download Report, call our office at 877 209 2455 .
Once payment has been made,
we will send you the download instructions.
The Following Reports
are Included |
|
Distributed Project
Management Industry Report 2002 (Volume 1) and the
Distributed Project Management Industry Report 2002-2003
(Volume 2 (4 Sections) sent by e-mail. |
|
Distributed Project Management Industry Report 2002-2003
(Volume 2: New Product Development Solutions Only) sent by
e-mail. |
|
Distributed Project Management Industry Report 2002-2003
(Volume 2: IT/Software Development Only) sent by e-mail. (January
2003 publication date) |
|
Distributed Project Management Industry Report 2002-2003
(Volume 2: Professional Service Automation Only) sent by e-mail.
Cost: $500.00* (January 2003 publication date) |
|
Distributed Project Management Industry Report 2002-2003
(Volume 2: Architecture/Engineering/Construction Only) sent
by e-mail. (January 2003 publication date) |
| |
For orders billed to California addresses,
add 8.5% sales tax.
|
| |
TOTAL PAYMENT
|
* All prices in US dollars.
How did you find out about this report? _____________________________
|
Name
|
|
Title
|
|
Organization Name
|
|
Telephone Number
|
|
Fax Number
|
|
E-Mail Address
|
|
Mailing Address
|
| |
Payment Information
We accept Visa and MasterCard. Please complete
the following information.
Card Number
|
Name (as it appears on the card)
|
Expiration Date / (MM/YY)
|
Billing Address
|
| |
If you wish to pay by check, payment must be
received prior to shipment. Please contact us for more information.
Fax this completed form to 415/550-8556 or e-mail to jenniec@collaborate.com.
|